Comments on: Standards and validation, what are they good for? http://www.elliotswan.com/2005/11/15/standards-and-validation-what-are-they-good-for/ designs stuff and writes code. Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:56:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Anna http://www.elliotswan.com/2005/11/15/standards-and-validation-what-are-they-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-12341 Anna Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:17:59 +0000 http://www.elliotswan.com/?p=65#comment-12341 Hello world Hello world

]]> By: Helga http://www.elliotswan.com/2005/11/15/standards-and-validation-what-are-they-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-12337 Helga Thu, 04 Jan 2007 06:24:56 +0000 http://www.elliotswan.com/?p=65#comment-12337 Hello world Hello world

]]> By: Zach Katkin http://www.elliotswan.com/2005/11/15/standards-and-validation-what-are-they-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-11828 Zach Katkin Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:37:30 +0000 http://www.elliotswan.com/?p=65#comment-11828 Thanks for the great post, I've cited your article on one of my own: <a href="http://www.thenapkin.com/index.php/is-your-web-sites-rank-on-google-affected-by-standards-compliance/">Is Your Web Site’s Rank On Google Affected By Standards-Compliance?</a> Enjoy! Thanks for the great post, I’ve cited your article on one of my own: Is Your Web Site’s Rank On Google Affected By Standards-Compliance?

Enjoy!

]]> By: Keno http://www.elliotswan.com/2005/11/15/standards-and-validation-what-are-they-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-11120 Keno Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:45:22 +0000 http://www.elliotswan.com/?p=65#comment-11120 Hello world Hello world

]]> By: Elliot Swan http://www.elliotswan.com/2005/11/15/standards-and-validation-what-are-they-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-279 Elliot Swan Sun, 20 Nov 2005 23:16:04 +0000 http://www.elliotswan.com/?p=65#comment-279 I'm all for standards, but I don't think one can say that just 'cause his site validates he followed standards. And I don't think one can say that just because his site doesn't validate he didn't follow standards. Validation is normally a good idea, but I think the idea behind standards should be the first concern. I’m all for standards, but I don’t think one can say that just ’cause his site validates he followed standards. And I don’t think one can say that just because his site doesn’t validate he didn’t follow standards. Validation is normally a good idea, but I think the idea behind standards should be the first concern.

]]> By: ChristianGeek http://www.elliotswan.com/2005/11/15/standards-and-validation-what-are-they-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-278 ChristianGeek Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:58:30 +0000 http://www.elliotswan.com/?p=65#comment-278 @ Jake & Elliot lol, Yah what are standards for, just don't tell some people that ;) @ Jake & Elliot lol, Yah what are standards for, just don’t tell some people that ;)

]]> By: Elliot Swan http://www.elliotswan.com/2005/11/15/standards-and-validation-what-are-they-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-273 Elliot Swan Fri, 18 Nov 2005 06:07:42 +0000 http://www.elliotswan.com/?p=65#comment-273 @Jake: Hahaha... You and your spam bots. @Jake: Hahaha… You and your spam bots.

]]> By: Karpa-Diem (Jake Garrison) http://www.elliotswan.com/2005/11/15/standards-and-validation-what-are-they-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-271 Karpa-Diem (Jake Garrison) Fri, 18 Nov 2005 03:13:15 +0000 http://www.elliotswan.com/?p=65#comment-271 Standards, UUH… What are they good for? Absolutely nothing y’all… Sorry, I’m just surprised no one has done that yet.

Uh oh… Elliot… your going to get the camp all stirred up again. :) I’m going to be doing the same in a few days (but with a different group). Sounds good though man. Love it when you write this kind of stuff. In the words of my friends the Spam bots

reading your content just made my day. keep the good work. how linux thin-clients benefit schools: [insert random spam url], TV will Stake unconditionally although i am bringing a change of underwear , when Cards Bet Girl Fetch few people are capable of expressing

]]> By: StyleMac.com » Blog Archive » Standards versus Validation? http://www.elliotswan.com/2005/11/15/standards-and-validation-what-are-they-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-269 StyleMac.com » Blog Archive » Standards versus Validation? Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:12:23 +0000 http://www.elliotswan.com/?p=65#comment-269 [...] s non-javascript browsers to access certain otherwise non-accesible site-elements instead. Read the whole discussion here. [...] [...] s non-javascript browsers to access certain otherwise non-accesible site-elements instead. Read the whole discussion here. [...]

]]> By: Oliver Zheng http://www.elliotswan.com/2005/11/15/standards-and-validation-what-are-they-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-266 Oliver Zheng Thu, 17 Nov 2005 05:14:05 +0000 http://www.elliotswan.com/?p=65#comment-266 I totally agree with you. I don't think the validation tool as an implementation of semantic coding works well for its purpose. If people need to put up links to the w3 referer validation check to prove to the viewers that their site does indeed validate (which I don't think anybody cares), the validation defeats its purpose. It's more important to the web designer him/herself to maintain that level of consciousness. I totally agree with you. I don’t think the validation tool as an implementation of semantic coding works well for its purpose. If people need to put up links to the w3 referer validation check to prove to the viewers that their site does indeed validate (which I don’t think anybody cares), the validation defeats its purpose. It’s more important to the web designer him/herself to maintain that level of consciousness.

]]>