Comments on: Simplicity, or Laziness? 5 Things Simplicity Should Never Be

By: neo

neo — Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:57:52 +0000

Simplicity is not avoiding complexity. It is mastering complexity and hiding it behind simplicity.

Simplicity is like a modest man with great knowledge and wisdom inside him.

By: daniel

daniel — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:14:40 +0000

“less is more” -hadrian jongolar

translates to music too.

By: AdamD

AdamD — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:29:33 +0000

When you come up with what it means to you, send a trackback here, eh?

http://www.adamduvander.com/simple/what-does-simplicity-mean-to-you

By: Simplicity Rules » What Simplicity Should Never Be

Simplicity Rules » What Simplicity Should Never Be — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:27:19 +0000

[...] Elliot weighs in with what simplicity should never be: [...]

By: Elliot Swan

Elliot Swan — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:22:41 +0000

Yeah, I’ll be doing that in another post sometime soon.

By: Matt Propst

Matt Propst — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:25:28 +0000

Ok you’ve clearly stated what simplicity isn’t or what it may hide within itself. But should a designer decide to create a site based on simple techniques or layouts, could you offer a correct way or example of simplicity.

True simplicity shouldn’t be lazy, but when can simplicity just be simple?