<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snippit: iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliotswan.com/2007/01/09/snippit-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliotswan.com/2007/01/09/snippit-iphone/</link>
	<description>designs stuff and writes code.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotswan.com/2007/01/09/snippit-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-13150</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 03:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotswan.com/2007/01/09/snippit-iphone/#comment-13150</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s revolutionary about it? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-and-lg-ke850-separated-at-birth/&quot;&gt;Touch screen interface&lt;/a&gt; for a phone? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ted.com/tedtalks/tedtalksplayer.cfm?key=j_han&quot;&gt;Multi Touch&lt;/a&gt;? I&#039;d include more links but I&#039;ll set off spam filters and nobody would see this. There&#039;s nothing revolutionary about iPhone, and in my opinion, a phone without tactile feedback isn&#039;t a good phone at all. Nor mp3 player, video player, camera, etc. Is it the integration? Can&#039;t be, Windows Mobile 5 does everything iPhone does. Surely, not as nice a UI by any means, but at least it&#039;s not a closed environment limiting you entirely to Apple&#039;s software. That&#039;s like leaping backwards over a decade in cell phone advancement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s revolutionary about it? <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/iphone-and-lg-ke850-separated-at-birth/">Touch screen interface</a> for a phone? <a href="http://www.ted.com/tedtalks/tedtalksplayer.cfm?key=j_han">Multi Touch</a>? I&#8217;d include more links but I&#8217;ll set off spam filters and nobody would see this. There&#8217;s nothing revolutionary about iPhone, and in my opinion, a phone without tactile feedback isn&#8217;t a good phone at all. Nor mp3 player, video player, camera, etc. Is it the integration? Can&#8217;t be, Windows Mobile 5 does everything iPhone does. Surely, not as nice a UI by any means, but at least it&#8217;s not a closed environment limiting you entirely to Apple&#8217;s software. That&#8217;s like leaping backwards over a decade in cell phone advancement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: propstm.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The iPhone is not for me</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotswan.com/2007/01/09/snippit-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-12841</link>
		<dc:creator>propstm.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The iPhone is not for me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotswan.com/2007/01/09/snippit-iphone/#comment-12841</guid>
		<description>[...] Nope, i will not have it!  I&#8217;m not a fan of the iPhone.  I will admit that it is damn sexy, and a sleek gadget for sure but it is not for me.  This post is pretty much in regards to Elliot Swan&#8217;s post stating that he NEEDS an iPhone.  I on the other hand, do not. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nope, i will not have it!  I&#8217;m not a fan of the iPhone.  I will admit that it is damn sexy, and a sleek gadget for sure but it is not for me.  This post is pretty much in regards to Elliot Swan&#8217;s post stating that he NEEDS an iPhone.  I on the other hand, do not. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotswan.com/2007/01/09/snippit-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-12827</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotswan.com/2007/01/09/snippit-iphone/#comment-12827</guid>
		<description>If you think of it just as a phone, then yes, it&#039;s crazy. But if you think of it as a revolutionary smart phone with OS X (normal smart phones run for ~$300-$400) + an ipod (~$200), it makes perfect sense.

It&#039;s really a lot more like a PDA running OS X with a phone built in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think of it just as a phone, then yes, it&#8217;s crazy. But if you think of it as a revolutionary smart phone with OS X (normal smart phones run for ~$300-$400) + an ipod (~$200), it makes perfect sense.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really a lot more like a PDA running OS X with a phone built in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Propst</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotswan.com/2007/01/09/snippit-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-12824</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Propst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotswan.com/2007/01/09/snippit-iphone/#comment-12824</guid>
		<description>No! $500 for a phone is crazy! (granted it does look sexy) it&#039;s just too expensive in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No! $500 for a phone is crazy! (granted it does look sexy) it&#8217;s just too expensive in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
