<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Short Attention Spans on the Internet Are a Good Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliotswan.com/2008/06/16/short-attention-spans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliotswan.com/2008/06/16/short-attention-spans/</link>
	<description>designs stuff and writes code.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotswan.com/2008/06/16/short-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-123034</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotswan.com/?p=416#comment-123034</guid>
		<description>Well, I think skimming and social media sites like Digg, Reddit, etc., are all ways of getting through the loads of information and finding what&#039;s the best use of one&#039;s time. I&#039;d say that raises standards to a point--if the headlines don&#039;t look interesting enough, it gets tossed in a pile. If it doesn&#039;t get enough votes, you don&#039;t read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think skimming and social media sites like Digg, Reddit, etc., are all ways of getting through the loads of information and finding what&#8217;s the best use of one&#8217;s time. I&#8217;d say that raises standards to a point&#8211;if the headlines don&#8217;t look interesting enough, it gets tossed in a pile. If it doesn&#8217;t get enough votes, you don&#8217;t read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nils Geylen</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotswan.com/2008/06/16/short-attention-spans/comment-page-1/#comment-123023</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils Geylen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotswan.com/?p=416#comment-123023</guid>
		<description>This is the post I maybe should have written today — I wrote another one, panicky and ill-at-ease over the information overload we do all face at times.

I&#039;m not sure that the vast amount of information (data?) we&#039;re faced with on the internet today has raised our standards per se. Has it? But maybe we&#039;ve been thrown back to a more meticulous approach to what we&#039;re being served, a more thought-out way of dealing with the possibilities.

In the end, you are right: this is not a problem, and it&#039;s not a bad thing to sit back, relax and realize we cannot possibly take it all in — and not go nuts over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the post I maybe should have written today — I wrote another one, panicky and ill-at-ease over the information overload we do all face at times.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that the vast amount of information (data?) we&#8217;re faced with on the internet today has raised our standards per se. Has it? But maybe we&#8217;ve been thrown back to a more meticulous approach to what we&#8217;re being served, a more thought-out way of dealing with the possibilities.</p>
<p>In the end, you are right: this is not a problem, and it&#8217;s not a bad thing to sit back, relax and realize we cannot possibly take it all in — and not go nuts over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
